Order Intake Ranking of 23 Major General Contractors| 2021 edition

In this issue of the “State of General Contractors” series, which provides an overview of the status of Japan’s major general contractors based on their business performance, etc., we will introduce the order intake rankings of the 23 major general contractors based on the order intake of each company in the fiscal year ending on March 31, 2021.

Considering the fact that general contractors are generally classified according to their company size, we will introduce the following in detail.

  1. Order intake ranking of the 23 major general contractors
  2. Order intake ranking of super general contractors
  3. Order intake ranking of semi-major general contractors
  4. Order intake ranking of mid-sized general contractors
  5. Order intake comparison by general contractor size
1. Order intake ranking of the 23 major general contractors

First, among the 23 major general contractors, Obayashi Corporation was the general contractor with the highest order intake at JPY 1.53 trillion. Taisei Corporation, Kajima Corporation, and Shimizu Corporation followed Obayashi Corporation with order intakes of JPY 1.32 trillion, JPY 1.27 trillion, and JPY 1.20 trillion, respectively. (See figure below)

Order intake (in billions JPY)  |  Ranking of 23 major general contractors

On the other hand, the general contractor with the lowest order intake was Asanuma Corporation with JPY 119.2 billion, followed by the Zenitaka Corporation, Tobishima Corporation, and Daiho Corporation, with JPY 120.3 billion, JPY 125 billion, and JPY 126.3 billion, respectively, indicating a 10-fold difference from the top general contractors. The average of the 23 companies is JPY 489.3 billion.

2. Order intake ranking of super general contractors

Next, when looking at the five super general contractors, Obayashi Corporation was the super general contractor with the highest order intake at JPY 1.53 trillion. This was followed by Taisei Corporation, Kajima Corporation, Shimizu Corporation, and Takenaka Corporation with order intakes of JPY 1.32 trillion, JPY 1.27 trillion, JPY 1.20 trillion, and JPY 966.5 billion, respectively. (See figure below)

Order intake (in billions JPY)  |  Ranking of 5 super general contractors

Among the super general contractors, Takenaka Corporation was the only firm whose order intake was below the JPY 1 trillion level. In addition, the difference in order intake between Obayashi Corporation and Takenaka Corporation is approximately JPY 560 billion, indicating that there is a large difference in order intakes even among the super general contractors. The average of the five super general contractors is JPY 1.26 trillion, which is an amount that is between the order intakes recorded by Kajima Corporation and Shimizu Corporation.

3. Order intake ranking of semi-major general contractors

Next, a look at the orders received by the 10 semi-major general contractors shows that Penta-Ocean Construction Co., Ltd. is the semi-major general contractor with the highest order intake at JPY 505.3 billion. Haseko Corporation, Toda Corporation, Maeda Corporation, and Fujita Corporation followed with JPY 430.3 billion, JPY 428.9 billion, JPY 411.9 billion, and JPY 399.8 billion, respectively. (See figure below)

Order intake (in billions JPY)  |  Ranking of 10 semi-major general contractors

On the other hand, the semi-major general contractor with the lowest order intake was Kumagai Gumi with JPY 283.4 billion, followed by Hazama Ando Corporation, Tokyu Construction Co., Ltd., Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd., and Sumitomo Mitsui Construction Co., Ltd. with JPY 300.9 billion, JPY 306.6 billion, JPY 312.3 billion, and JPY 316.4 billion, respectively. The average of the semi-major general contractors is around JPY 369.6 billion, which is between the order intakes recorded by Fujita Corporation and Sumitomo Mitsui Construction Co., Ltd.

4. Order intake ranking of mid-sized general contractors

Looking at the orders received by the eight mid-sized general contractors, the general contractor with the highest order intake was Toa Corporation with JPY 248.7 billion. Okumura Corporation, Toyo Construction Co., Ltd., and Tekken Corporation followed with JPY 222.2 billion, JPY 158.2 billion, and JPY 153.5 billion, respectively. (See figure below)

Order intake (in billions JPY)  |  Ranking of 8 mid-sized general contractors

On the other hand, the mid-sized general contractor with the lowest order intake was Asanuma Corporation with JPY 119.2 billion, followed by the Zenitaka Corporation, Tobishima Corporation, and Daiho Corporation with JPY 120.3 billion, JPY 125.0 billion, and JPY 126.3 billion, respectively. The average for mid-sized general contractors is about JPY 159.2 billion, which is between the order intakes recorded by Okumura Corporation and Toyo Construction Co., Ltd.

5. Order intake comparison by general contractor size

The average order intake recorded by the five super general contractors is JPY 1.26 trillion. The average order intake recorded by the 10 semi-major general contractors is JPY 369.6 billion. The average order intake recorded by the eight mid-sized general contractors is JPY 159.2 billion. This indicates the scale of super general contractors is about 3.4 times larger than that of semi-major general contractors and about 7.9 times larger than that of mid-sized general contractors in terms of average order intake. (See figure below)

Order intake (in billions JPY)  |  Comparison by general contractor size

From the same perspective, the size of semi-major general contractors is about 2.3 times larger than that of mid-sized general contractors. The average of the 18 semi-major and mid-sized general contractors and 23 major general contractors was JPY 276.1 billion and JPY 489.3 billion, respectively.

Reference | Data List

Lastly, the following is a list of the 23 major general contractors and the data used for reference.

list of the 23 major general contractors

General
contractor size
Company
Super general contractorsShimizu Corporation, Taisei Corporation, Obayashi Corporation, Kajima Corporation, Takenaka Corporation
Semi-major general contractorsPenta-Ocean Construction Co.,Ltd., Haseko Corporation, Toda Corporation
Kumagai Gumi Co.,Ltd., Maeda Corporation, Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Mitsui Construction Co., Ltd., Hazama Ando Corporation, Tokyu Construction Co., Ltd., Fujita Corporation
Mid-sized general contractorsOkumura Corporation, Tekken Corporation, Toyo Construction Co., Ltd., Toa Corporation, Asanuma Corporation, Tobishima Corporation, Zenitaka Corporation, Daiho Corporation

Data for Order Intake Ranking of 23 Major General Contractors

CompanyOrder intake
(in billions JPY)
General contractor size
Obayashi1,530.0super general contractors
Taisei1,321.5super general contractors
Kajima1,265.2super general contractors
Shimizu1,201.0super general contractors
Takenaka966.5super general contractors
Penta-Ocean Construction505.3semi-major general contractors
Haseko430.3semi-major general contractors
Toda428.9semi-major general contractors
Maeda411.9semi-major general contractors
Fujita399.8semi-major general contractors
Sumitomo Mitsui Construction316.4semi-major general contractors
Nishimatsu Construction312.3semi-major general contractors
Tokyu Construction306.6semi-major general contractors
Hazama Ando300.9semi-major general contractors
Kumagai Gumi283.4semi-major general contractors
Toa248.7mid-sized general contractors
Okumura222.2mid-sized general contractors
Toyo Construction158.2mid-sized general contractors
Tekken153.5mid-sized general contractors
Daiho126.3mid-sized general contractors
Tobishima125.0mid-sized general contractors
Zenitaka120.3mid-sized general contractors
Asanuma119.2mid-sized general contractors
Average of 5 super GCs1,256.85 super GCs
Average of 10 semi-major GCs369.610 semi-major GCs
Average of 8 mid-sized GCs159.28 mid-sized GCs
Average of 18 semi-major and mid-sized GCs276.118 semi-major and mid-sized GCs
Average of 23 major GCs489.323 major GCs

Source: Compiled based on each company’s annual securities report and financial statements (as of March 31, 2021) Values are based on each company’s “non-consolidated” figures.

Related Articles

  • New Articles
  • Recommended Articles
  • Featured Articles

Comment

There are no comment yet.

TOP